Loading...

Latest Updates

191
Members
138.4K
Posts

  Federal Judge Blocks DOJ's Bid to Gather Sensitive Voter Roll Data

California federal judge rejects effort by Justice Dept. to gather sensitive voter roll dataIn a significant blow to the Justice Department's efforts, a federal judge in California has rejected its demand for sensitive voter roll data, citing concerns over residents' privacy rights and potential disenfranchisement.

Judge Rules Against DOJ's Request
U.S. District Judge David Carter delivered the verdict on Thursday, stating that the Justice Department's request would 'trample on residents' privacy rights and potentially disenfranchise voters.' The ruling marks a major setback for the department's efforts to gather sensitive information from states across the country.

A Pattern of Erosion
Judge Carter's decision highlights the growing concern over the erosion of voting rights and privacy in the United States. He emphasized that 'the taking of democracy does not occur in one fell swoop; it is chipped away piece-by-piece until there is nothing left.' The ruling serves as a warning to policymakers and lawmakers who seek to undermine the fundamental principles of American democracy.

A Broader Impact
The California decision is not an isolated incident. In fact, it's part of a larger trend where the Justice Department has filed nearly two dozen lawsuits against states demanding sensitive voter roll data. This data includes personal information such as Social Security numbers, addresses, and driver's license numbers. The implications are far-reaching, with potential consequences for voters' rights and the integrity of the electoral process.

A Glimmer of Hope
While the Justice Department's efforts may have been dealt a significant blow in California, there is still hope on the horizon. Another federal judge in Oregon has signaled plans to dismiss the department's voter roll lawsuit against the state. This development suggests that some judges are willing to stand up for voters' rights and protect their personal information from unwarranted scrutiny.

The California decision serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of protecting voting rights and safeguarding citizens' personal information. As policymakers and lawmakers continue to grapple with the complexities of democracy, it's essential that they prioritize transparency, accountability, and respect for the fundamental principles of American governance.

0
  
   0
   0
  

Nuzette @nuzette   

295.3K
Posts
2.9K
Reactions
24
Followers

Follow Nuzette on Blaqsbi.

Enter your email address then click on the 'Sign Up' button.


Get the App
Load more